Hi Martin. I’m not a scientist, but I have been a research engineer for years. I did go a little too far with that phrase. But I don’t believe it is biased because it is within the scientific method

Which explanation is more likely? which hypothesis fits all the available data and fits in our current understanding of the laws of physics? The parallax and the interfered radar.

Until more data can be shown to disprove the more simple explanation we shouldn’t jump to wild conclusions

I agree the phase was too strong but I wanted people to see that wild explanations sometimes lead us astray.